State of Utah Center of Excellence for Biomedical Microfluidics

Home Research Publications Personnel Education

Microfluidic Packaging
Microfluidic Packaging Protein Flows

 

Students Involved:  David Chang-Yen and Andrew Christensen

A simple and cost effective packaging technique for PDMS microfluidic and microoptical systems has been developed.  The technique involves the novel method of drilling a small hole in the PDMS to access the micro channels using a modified 20 gauge needle. An unmodified needle is then inserted into the hole, creating a direct connection to the microchannel that requires no bonding or molding.  The interface can than be removed and reinserted multiple times. The luer fitting on the needles is be easily connected to standard fluid fittings.  The optical packaging involves traditional tapered interfaces to bring the fiber optics in contact with PDMS waveguides.

Packaging for microsystems has historically been a challenge due to size and cost.  Microfluidic devices typically require multiple interconnects and in many cases the packaging components are much larger then the microsystems they interface.  Common PDMS packaging techniques require tubing to be glued or molded to the substrate mak ing it impossible to remove [1].  Some of these systems have been demonstrated at high pressures. However, most micro fluidic systems require less then 70 kPa internal pressure, so high pressure is not a typical concern. 

The microfluidic packaging technique is implemented by creating a coring tool from a 20 gage blunt needle.  Using a Dremel tool the needle is filed down on the outer edge to create a beveled edge (see Figure 2).  Using a twisting motion, the coring tool is used to cut a hole through the PDMS to the channel.  The hole created has a diameter identical to the inner diameter of the 20 gauge needle (610μm). When a second unaltered 20 gage needle is inserted a compression seal is formed around the needle since the outer diameter of the needle is 950μm, 340μm larger than the hole (see Figure 1). The technique should be easily automated and can be done in parallel.

The optical packaging technique uses a V-shaped guide to direct the fiber optics directly to the waveguide (Figure5).  Combined with the integrated optics, microfluidics, and the microfluidics packaging, a simple, inexpensive and robust system is generated [2].

The microfluidic packaging was tested by creating channels in a 6 mm layer of PDMS using an SU-8 mold.  The ports were created using the coring tool and the channel layer was then bonded to another layer of PDMS using liquid PDMS as the bonding agent (see Figures 3 & 4).  In each of the four tests conducted, the system leaked at the bond between the PDMS layers before leaking at the needle port. During testing, pressure reached up to 489 kPa psi (see Table 1).  The holes are extremely flexible and durable allowing the needle to be pushed at least 30 degrees in any directing without leaking.  In most cases, the seals held at these pressures even after inserting and removing the needle over 100 times.   The thickness of PDMS has some effect on the allowable flexure angles and maximum pressures.  The coring tool’s rotation speed and pitch also affect the surface roughness of the hole which in turn affects the leakage pressure.  These techniques mak e it possible to design a robust microfluidic and microoptical system without adding significant cost or complexity.  

REFERENCES

[1] Jaeggi, D., Gray, Proceedings of the Solid-State Sensor and Actuator Workshop, Hilton Head, South Carolina, June 8 - 11, 1998, pp. 112 - 115.

[2] David A. Chang-yen and Bruce K. Gale, “Integrated optical glucose sensor fabricated using PDMS waveguides on a PDMS substrate,” Proc. Of SPIE: Microfluidics, BioMEMS, and Medical Microsystems II, San Jose , CA , Vol. 5345, January 25-27, 2004 , pp. 98-107.

 

               

Figure 1:  Manufacturing Process                                     Figure 2: Needle and Coring Tool    

 

   

Figure 3: Interface Setup                       Figure 4: Setup for pressure measurements

 

Table 1: Pressure Test Results

 Test

Max Pressure (kPa)

1

165.474

2

330.948.

3

461.948

4

489.527

NOTE: All tests concluded with

 failure at the seal between

the bonded PDMS and not

at the port

 

 

 Figure 5. Interfaces between waveguides and fiber optics

 

Andrew M. Christensen, David A. Chang-Yen, and Bruce K. Gale, “Characterization Of Interconnects Used In PDMS Microfluidic Systems,” Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, Vol. 15, pp. 928-935, 2005.

 

 
Send mail to bruce.gale@utah.edu with questions or comments about this web site.
Copyright © 2006 State of Utah Center of Excellence for Biomedical Microfluidics
Last modified: March 09, 2007
Disclaimer